Chair in Economic Policy

Innovationtheory and -Policy

  • Type: Lecture / Exercise
  • Target group: M. Sc.
  • Semester: SS
  • Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Ingrid Ott
  • ECTS: 4,5
Prerequisites

Recommendations:

Basic knowledge of micro- and macroeconomics is assumed, as taught in the courses Economics I [2600012], and Economics II [2600014]. In addition, an interest in quantitative-mathematical modeling is required.

Bibliography

Excerpt:

  • Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (2009), The Economics of Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
  • de la Fuente, A. (2000), Mathematical Methods and Models for Economists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Klodt, H. (1995), Grundlagen der Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Vahlen, München.
  • Linde, R. (2000), Allokation, Wettbewerb, Verteilung - Theorie, UNIBUCH Verlag, Lüneburg.
  • Ruttan, V. W. (2001), Technology, Growth, and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Scotchmer, S. (2004), Incentives and Innovation, MIT Press.
  • Tirole, Jean (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Content of teaching
  • Incentives for the emergence of innovations
  • Patents
  • Diffusion
  • Impact of technological progress
  • Innovation Policy
Workload

The total workload for this course is approximately 135.0 hours. For further information see German version.

Aim

Students shall be given the ability to

  • identify the importance of alternative incentive mechanisms for the emergence and dissemination of innovations
  • understand the relationships between market structure and the development of innovation
  • explain, in which situations market interventions by the state, for example taxes and subsidies, can be legitimized, and evaluate them in the light of economic welfare
Exam description

The assessment consists of a written exam (60 min) according to Section 4(2), 1 of the examination regulation. The exam takes place in every semester. Re-examinations are offered at every ordinary examination date.

Students will be given the opportunity of writing and presenting a short paper during the lecture time to achieve a bonus on the exam grade. If the mandatory credit point exam is passed, the awarded bonus points will be added to the regular exam points. A deterioration is not possible by definition, and a grade does not necessarily improve, but is very likely to (not every additional point improves the total number of points, since a grade can not become better than 1). The voluntary elaboration of such a paper can not countervail a fail in the exam.